WHO Changes Stance On COVID-19 Vaccines For Children
The World Health Organization (WHO) updated their guidance for COVID-19 vaccinations and, they’re now declaring that healthy children and teens do not need to receive the vaccination.
The Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE), a group under the WHO, established a “revised roadmap” for COVID-19 vaccines. The group determines which demographics have a high and low vulnerability to COVID-19, and vaccine recommendations are made accordingly. To no surprise, healthy children under the age of 18 have been deemed low priority. SAGE is also not recommending additional boosters for any healthy adults under the age of 60.
“The public health impact of vaccinating healthy children and adolescents is comparatively much lower than the established benefits of traditional essential vaccines for children – such as the rotavirus, measles, and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines.”
SAGE Press Release
Since the height of the pandemic, experts who were honest about the data pertaining to COVID-19 expressed the fact that children were highly unlikely to die or become critically sick from the virus. But this data was largely ignored by the mainstream media and our politicians.
Across the country, hundreds of thousands of children were coerced into receiving the COVID-19 vaccine due to school mandates that required students to be vaccinated. These mandates were implemented on the advice of experts who stated COVID-19 was a significant threat to children, and that the vaccine would also prevent children from transmitting the virus. But neither of these statements were true. It is only now, after many parents vaccinated their children due to the immense social pressure, that the WHO is finally being honest about the science behind the COVID-19 vaccinations for children.
It is clear that scientific experts should have been more honest about the severity of the virus for all age groups. It is because of their dishonesty that millions of individuals were unable to make individual medical decisions with accurate information. Being honest about the data a year later is too little too late.
