Joy Reid’s Racial Bigotry Triggered by Kyle Rittenhouse’s “White Male Tears”

Joy Reid, the racist provocateur of MSNBC and host of “The Reidout,” made a rather telling and racially motivated video regarding “white male tears.” Her bigotry allowed her to unashamedly and passionately explain how Kyle Rittenhouse has utilized his tears to get out of a guilty conviction in a trial that had, at that particular time, yet to deliver a verdict.  She also compared Rittenhouse to the likes of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, correlating the two due to the hue of their skin and their ability to use their “white male tears” to get them out of sticky situations. The amount of disdain this woman has for Kyle Rittenhouse, not to mention ALL white (conservative) people, is absolutely astounding and would have been fully recognized by her colleagues and counterparts had they been people of an upstanding report. 

I must say, this does flabbergast me. Aside from the race-bating, race-hustling, racially charged sentiments, I really wish these bigoted feminists could get it straight in their heads the message they are trying to convey to the American people. These ignoramuses have a knack for opening that hole in their faces and spouting complete and utter nonsensically counterintuitive platitudes – of the hypocritical sort. Are men supposed to cry, or are we not allowed to? I was under the impression that “toxic masculinity” was partly shaped around men who were too “tough” to show sufficient emotion. So in the cases of Rittenhouse, Justice Kavanaugh, and every other white man, is it is ok for them to shed tears, or is it not deemed acceptable as long as they are white? If that’s the case, are white tears a sign of cultural appropriation since only ethnic tears are considered authentic? Are white people then mocking those of a more ethnic persuasion if they cry, since they are “clearly” soulless beings devoid of feelings, or are they capable of such emotion at all, though not allowed to showcase said emotion for the cause of social justice? Moreover, the tears from a white ally, are they permitted? What about “white female tears,” and are such things also permissible in today’s culture? So many questions, not enough answers!

As for the rest of orderly society, we understand the significance of every person’s ability to shed tears, black/white/brown alike. Similarly, in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse – an 18-year-old young man just beginning his adult life, who was on trial for HIS LIFE because he defended himself – his tears are undoubtedly appropriate given the gravity of the situation.

Just last year, Kyle was an underaged boy, a leader amongst men, standing on the courage of his convictions as he stood for what he believed to be right within the confines of the law, doing what he must whilst the scourge of society descended upon various areas of our country for destructive purposes. Armed with a rifle for self-defense, his primary task as he defended businesses was to render first aid to those hurt by the riotous dregs destroying such cities, like parasites traveling from host to host, leaving behind the desiccated remains of their unsuspected victims. To see a young man with a heart of gold, selfless and resolute, having to defend his very life by taking someone else’s, then having to run for his life from the hordes of degenerate filth wishing him harm, is tripped up and falls to the ground. Although he is beset on all sides, he still has the discipline to ONLY dispatch at close range those who pose an immediate threat to his person, which is absolutely incredible by ANY standard. Then, to have this young man maligned by everyone in leftist media, illegitimate, immoral organizations like BLM, politicians & public servants, including the current President of the United States, being called a racist at every turn (though he only shot white men), being dragged to court, debased and character assassinated on national television while his entire life is on full display and dissected to the finest of points, and scrutinized on the witness stand as prosecutors try and paint him as some vicious man murdering machine akin to the Terminator, is a fate I don’t wish on my worst enemy. This young man, with no criminal history, having his conscience plagued with the fact that he had to kill two people in efforts to preserve his own life, undoubtedly struggling with PTSD, emotionally overwhelmed, facing life in prison – it is absolutely reasonable to expect such a person to showcase at least a few “white male tears.” What say you, Joy?

However, I do not expect the unreasonable to understand, as the racially bigoted fail to comprehend the basics of humanity when only viewed via the lens of racism. This is inexcusable, though what is even more egregious is Joy’s ability to fulminate such hate on a network geared toward promoting racial divides amongst citizens within this democratic republic. Reasonable doubt be damned, common decency be damned, integrity be damned, facts be damned – the narrative is the name of the game and the order of the day, as Kyle Rittenhouse, albeit “not guilty” in the eyes of the law, has already been declared “guilty” by the court of leftist public opinion, for the despicable crime of being a cis-gendered white male, who dared, shed a tear.