1,000 Families File Suit Against Gender Service Clinic in the UK while Boston Hospital Enacts ‘Gender-Affirming Hysterectomies’ for Children
1,000 families have filed a class action lawsuit against Britain’s only publicly funded gender service clinic, The Tavistock Centre. The clinic has recently come under fire for rushing medical treatment on children who exhibited even minor signs of gender-dysphoria.
The clinic was known to prescribe puberty-blockers to adolescents. Medical providers claimed the drugs to prevent maturation were ‘fully reversible’ and harmless, without sufficient evidence to back up their claims.
Mayo Clinic explains common side affects from taking puberty blocking medications that can and do last long-term: lower bone density, slowed growth, prevent future fertility and more. Mayo Clinic adds that children who delay puberty might exhibit signs of lower self-esteem and higher levels of stress. These are just some of the known side affects of what is effectively a new medical experiment on a generation of children.
The Epoch Times reported, “[Tavistock] is set to close next spring after an independent review, commissioned by the National Health Service, the UK’s health care provider, and chaired by Dr. Hillary Cass, in February 2022, found grave issues around the safety and well-being of children.”
Lawyers involved in suing the clinic are claiming criminal negligence on behalf of the medical provider for giving underage children extremely short medical consultations before prescribing puberty blocking medication. The staff would immediately move to prescribe serious and life-altering drugs before considering therapy or other alternatives.
In a letter from Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo to members of the Florida Board of Medicine, he writes:
While some professional organizations . . . recommend these treatments [puberty blockers] for “gender affirming” care, the scientific evidence supporting these complex medical interventions is extraordinarily weak . . . the overview conducted by Dr. Brignardello-Peterson and Dr. Wiercioch states that “there is great uncertainty about the effects of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries in young people with gender dysphoria.”
The current standards set by numerous professional organizations appear to follow a preferred political ideology instead of the highest level of generally accepted medical science . . .
The Agency ultimately concluded that “Available medical literature provides insufficient evidence that sex reassignment through medical interventions is a safe and effective treatment for gender dysphoria.”
Unfortunately, a plethora of medical institutions are all too eager to take part in “gender-affirming” care, presumably because it creates life-long patients. Most recently, Boston Children’s Hospital has boasted a new gender clinic that will perform “gender-affirming hysterectomies” which “involve the removal of the cervix, or the lower, narrow end of the uterus that forms a canal between the uterus and vagina, as well as the fallopian tubes.”
These procedures are unfathomably harmful to children. Kids are not mentally capable of conceiving the gravity of their decisions, or rather the decisions being hoisted upon them by the deranged adults in the room. Boston Children’s Hospital has decided to take away a healthy human being’s ability to bear children — they have taken it upon themselves to determine the future of their patients.
We also haven’t even begun to mention the consequences and side effects of hysterectomies, which include heavy bleeding, ureter damage, bladder or bowel damage, infection, blood clots, early menopause, and depression.
This is being done to children. Perfectly healthy children, who do not need this invasive medical intervention, who doctors are now butchering.
Removing vital aspects of what makes a girl a female does not suddenly make her a male, it is medical dismemberment, and in the UK families are just beginning to speak up. We have not even scratched the surface of the legal consequences awaiting hospitals in the states that enact these procedures.
